Which act is provided as the example for federal statute formatting?

Which act is provided as the example for federal statute formatting?

• A. Clean Air Act
• B. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
• C. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
• D. Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

Answer: (C)

Federal statute formatting is illustrated by long, descriptive titles that present the law’s scope with a series of capitalized terms separated by commas and ending in “Act.” The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act is the classic example because its official name stacks several distinct concepts—environmental response, compensation, and liability—into one multi-part title, and it’s widely cited by its acronym CERCLA. This combination—a lengthy, multi-term title with a final “Act” and a well-known acronym—is the pattern textbooks and practice materials use to show how federal statutes are named and cited. The other acts are real and important, but their titles don’t demonstrate this same common formatting pattern as clearly.

Federal statute formatting is illustrated by long, descriptive titles that present the law’s scope with a series of capitalized terms separated by commas and ending in “Act.” The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act is the classic example because its official name stacks several distinct concepts—environmental response, compensation, and liability—into one multi-part title, and it’s widely cited by its acronym CERCLA. This combination—a lengthy, multi-term title with a final “Act” and a well-known acronym—is the pattern textbooks and practice materials use to show how federal statutes are named and cited. The other acts are real and important, but their titles don’t demonstrate this same common formatting pattern as clearly.