What is the primary function of the conclusion in a motion brief?

What is the primary function of the conclusion in a motion brief?

• A. To restate the relief sought and briefly summarize why it should be granted or denied
• B. To present additional factual background not included earlier
• C. To list all authorities cited in the brief
• D. To provide a concise request for relief and brief advocacy of the court's ruling

Answer: (D)

The conclusion functions to present a concise request for relief and brief advocacy of the court's ruling. This part of the motion is where you explicitly ask the court to grant the relief sought and make a short, persuasive statement in support of why that relief should be granted. It should not introduce new facts or add additional authorities—those belong in the main body of the brief or in separate sections. Restating the relief and summarizing why it should be granted or denied can appear, but the emphasis in the conclusion is a direct prayer for relief coupled with a succinct persuasive point. Presenting new factual background or listing all authorities belongs in other sections, not in the conclusion.

The conclusion functions to present a concise request for relief and brief advocacy of the court's ruling. This part of the motion is where you explicitly ask the court to grant the relief sought and make a short, persuasive statement in support of why that relief should be granted. It should not introduce new facts or add additional authorities—those belong in the main body of the brief or in separate sections. Restating the relief and summarizing why it should be granted or denied can appear, but the emphasis in the conclusion is a direct prayer for relief coupled with a succinct persuasive point. Presenting new factual background or listing all authorities belongs in other sections, not in the conclusion.